Wikibooks:ਸੱਥ: ਰੀਵਿਜ਼ਨਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਫ਼ਰਕ
ਸਮੱਗਰੀ ਮਿਟਾਈ ਸਮੱਗਰੀ ਜੋੜੀ
→Comments: improved |
|||
ਲਾਈਨ 42:
===Comments===
I support Satdeep Gill , as no better choice is available.There are presently only 4 active users on this project,positive aspect of Satdeep Gill is that he has been greatly instrumental in promoting more number of active users on punjabi wiki which so far had very less no. of users compared to community size ; but for his limitations in administrator actions , he has to improve a lot , examples are ; poor-knowledge as example look [https://pa.wikipedia.org/wiki/ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ:ਸੱਥ#.E0.A8.AA.E0.A9.8D.E0.A8.B0.E0.A8.B8.E0.A8.BC.E0.A8.BE.E0.A8.B8.E0.A8.95_.E0.A8.AC.E0.A8.A3.E0.A8.A8_.E0.A8.B8.E0.A9.B0.E0.A8.AC.E0.A9.B0.E0.A8.A7.E0.A9.80_.E0.A8.A8.E0.A9.80.E0.A8.A4.E0.A9.80 here] ;he could not explain or define simple term such as '''active user ''' while putting a '''draft policy for becoming administrator''' 'on punjabi Wikipedia village pump and after a lengthy discussion , could only be convinced that he does not know this term and replied let community define it ;which he is yet to improve upon .--[[ਵਰਤੋਂਕਾਰ:Guglani|Guglani]] ([[ਵਰਤੋਂਕਾਰ ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ:Guglani|ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ]]) 12:37, 19 ਦਸੰਬਰ 2015 (UTC)
:administrators should promise that on such new project their 90% edits should be main space edits for content creation, rather than deletion to become example for other users.Deletion by administrators should be resorted to only vulgar content or license issues on a new project like this. --[[ਵਰਤੋਂਕਾਰ:Guglani|Guglani]] ([[ਵਰਤੋਂਕਾਰ ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ:Guglani|ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ]]) 13:04, 20 ਦਸੰਬਰ 2015 (UTC)
| |||